e-learningsite.com

free essays
Uncategorized

Evidence Based Practice

EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE 7

EvidenceBased Practice

Thearticle is aimed at presenting ways and reducinguse of indwelling urinary catheters and associated urinary tractinfections, understanding CAUTIs and the duration of catheterizationas a major risk factor. UTIs account for 32 percent of all infectionsassociated with healthcare. Data was collected during interventionphase of catheterization. The study consisted of patients admitted inMICU with urinary tract infection. Urinary catheters are routinelyused in ICU to monitor urinary ispresented clearly in the oral report Inr Strategies to curb CAUTIs have put focus on drainage system,catheter materials, use of anti-effective agents, and insertiontechniques. In all the investigated methods, the most important andviable way is limiting the use of catheters (Elpernet al., 2009).

Evidencefor Nursing Practice

Scoring

1. The author’s credentials suggest that the author is an expert inthe area of the research.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

6-theauthor is an expert. He gives an account of the previous researchthat UTI (urinary track infection contributes to about 32% of allhealth care infections.

2. The title of the article accurately reflects the article’scontent.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

7-stronglyagree

3. The problem being investigated is clearly stated and is relevantto nursing and health.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

7-stronglyagree

4. The literature review is well organized, addresses all studyvariables and highlights strengths and weaknesses of previous studiesin the field.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

7-Stronglyagree

5. The conceptual/theoretical framework is clearly identified,developed, and applicable to the research.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

5-frameworkwell identified and developed by applicability not sufficient

6. The research questions or hypotheses are clearly stated.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

6-Ithas concepts with no definitions of existing theory it lackscomprehension of the concepts and theories. Lacks critical outlook

7. Each of the variables is operationally defined.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

7-stronglyagree

8. The research design is appropriate for the variables to bestudied and the purpose of the research.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

7-stronglyagree

9. The method of selecting the sample is appropriate (with inclusionand exclusion criteria stated), and the sample has sufficient power.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

6-Thepower of a given study is given by alpha level, sample size, andeffect size. The sample size is sufficient

10. The researcher thoroughly addresses ethical considerations.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

7-stronglyagree

11. The method for gathering data is clearly described and could bereplicated.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

7-stronglyagree

12. If measurement instruments or scales are used, reliability andvalidity are clearly addressed?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

5-notwell addressed, the measures does not provide deep data to ensureauthentic validity

13. The researcher links findings to existing research or theory andmakes appropriate recommendations for further research.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

5-Does not link though opportunities for further research such as theactual utilization of indwelling catheter (Elpernet al, 2009).

References

Elpern,H., E., Killeen, K., A. Ketchem, A. W., Patel, G., &amp Lateef, A.O. (2009). Reducing Use of Indwelling Urinary Catheters andAssociated Urinary Tract Infections.&quot . AmericanJournal of Critical Care 18(6),535-41.