e-learningsite.com

free essays
Free essays

Evidence of Nursing Practice

Evidenceof Nursing Practice

Evidenceof Nursing Practice

Scoring

1. The author’s credentials suggest that the author is an expert inthe area of the research.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7 (strongly agree)

2. The title of the article accurately reflects the article’scontent.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7(strongly agree)

3. The problem being investigated is clearly stated and is relevantto nursing and health.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7(strongly agree)

4. The literature review is well organized, addresses all studyvariables and highlights strengths and weaknesses of previous studiesin the field.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7(strongly agree)

5. The conceptual/theoretical framework is clearly identified,developed, and applicable to the research.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 1 (strongly disagree)

Theresearchers failed to identify and develop a clear conceptualframework to guide their research.

6. The research questions or hypotheses are clearly stated.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7 (strongly agree)

7. Each of the variables is operationally defined.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7 (strongly agree)

8. The research design is appropriate for the variables to be studiedand the purpose of the research.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 5

Theuse of a one-group pretest-post-test design without control groupcould hinder the evaluation of the impact of non-specific effects,including the use of MP3 player.

9. The method of selecting the sample is appropriate (with inclusionand exclusion criteria stated), and the sample has sufficient power.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 4

Theresearchers used a convenience sample of well educated participants,which may not have been a suitable representation of the patientpopulation.

10. The researcher thoroughly addresses ethical considerations.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7 (strongly agree)

11. The method for gathering data is clearly described and could bereplicated.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 6

12. If measurement instruments or scales are used, reliability andvalidity are clearly addressed?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7 (strongly agree)

13. The results section clearly describes how the collected datawere analyzed. The method of data analysis is correct for themeasurement level of the variables (e.g., categorical, continuous)and the goal of the study.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7 (strongly agree)

14. Significant findings are clearly described in text withsupporting statistics and summarized, if appropriate, in tables orfigures.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7 (strongly agree)

15. The researcher links findings to existing research or theory andmakes appropriate recommendations for further research.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X

Ascore of 7 (strongly agree)

Strengths

Allthe researchers who conducted the study are professionals withexperience in the field of nursing. The title of the study capturesthe content of the study. The researcher managed to organize theliterature review, identify what has already been covered in theprevious studies and existing knowledge gaps. For example, theresearchers identified that there are no studies testing the impactof behavioral strategies on symptom clusters. The research questionsare well stated and address all the variables under research. Theresearchers also managed to define the research variables, whichenhances the understanding the research measures. The co-occurringsymptoms under study and the patient-centered interventions are welldescribed. The researchers addressed the ethical considerationrequired in scientific research. They obtained an informed consentfrom the willing study participants. The data collection method isexplained with clarity, such that the procedure and be followed toobtain similar findings. The reliability as well as the validity ofthe MD Anderson Symptom Inventory was tested using the Cronbach’salpha test. In addition, the researchers presented their results indifferent categories and attached tables that enhance the readers’understanding of the findings. The discussion section helped theresearchers in linking the findings with results of previous studiesand identifies gaps for future research, including the need to mailthe questionnaires in advance and call respondents on the day thequestionnaire needs to be completed.

Weaknesses

Theresearch has three major weaknesses that reduce the reliability ofits findings. First, the researchers failed to describe the researchframework that guided their work. Secondly, although thepretest-posttest is a valid design, lack of control group reduced thecapacity of the researchers to evaluate the impact of non-specificeffects. Third, the researchers used a convenient approach to selectthe study participants. This introduced reduced the capacity of thestudy sample to act as a representative the target population.

Reference

Kwekkeboom,L., Abbott-Anderson, K. &amp Wanta, B. (2010). Feasibility of apatient-controlled cognitive behavioral intervention for pain,fatigue, and sleep disturbance in cancer. OncologyNursing Journal,37 (3), E151-E159.