GOOGLE TRENDS 3
Fromthe graphs, it can be argued that the cases of Lyme disease in Googletrends are higher than from the CDC results. The results from Googletrends indicate an increase in incidences of the disease from 2004 to2005. There is a sharp decline from 2005 to 2006 after which theincidences seems at the same level until 2010 when there is adecline. The results from Google trends indicate an increase in theincidences from 2010 to 2012. On the contrary, the incidences of thedisease from CDC seem much lower than the results from Google trends. Google trends indicate a high number of cases than CDC because ofthe assumption that when a person searches information about thedisease on Google, he or she is sick. The high number of cases ofLyme disease, therefore, indicates that many people have searchedinformation about the disease.
Basedon West Nile virus, Google trends indicate a decline in cases of theillness from 2004 to 2011, after which there is a sharp increase inthe cases from 2011 to 2012. This indicates that there was a declinein the number of internet users who searched for information aboutWest Nile Virus. However, in 2012, the number of people who searchedthe internet about the illness increased tremendously. Based on CDC,there is an increase in the cases of the disease from 2004 to 2006after which incidences of the illness remain at constant. Theresearch conducted by CDC also indicates a decline in the incidencesof the illness from 2007 to 2011 after which many cases of theillness are reported in 2012. There is a relationship that existsbetween the results of Google trends and CDC. It is evident thatthere is an increase in the cases of the illness in 2012. As CDCreported more cases, more people searched the internet forinformation about the illness.
Thecases of rabies tend to decline on Google trends from 2004 to 2012while the cases of the same disease on CDC reports are at a lowerlevel. Based on the graph, one can conclude that there are morepeople searching the internet about the disease in 2004 after whichthe number of internet users seeking information about the illnesstends to decline. In addition, the cases reported by CDC are lowerthan the real incidences of the disease. This implies that there arenot many people suffering from the disease as indicated on Google.The results on Google trends indicate an increase in the cases ofType 2 diabetes on Google trends from the CDC reports, however, theresults of the illness seem relatively low. This implies that thereare few cases of the disease while the number of people seeking toacquire knowledge about the illness has increased over the years.
Itis worth noting that the incidences of the four diseases discussedtend to be lower on Google trends than in CDC reports. This emanatesfrom the fact that a large number of people want to searchinformation about diseases in the internet than the actual cases ofthe diseases. Thus, the number of people interested in knowing aboutvarious diseases surpasses the actual rates of diseases. Based on thestudy, it can be hypothesized that the incidences of Lyme disease,West Nile Virus, rabies, and Type 2 diabetes is higher on Googletrends than in the reports by CDC.