free essays
Free essays

Human Resources Vs. Hospital Mortality Rates


HumanResources Vs. Hospital Mortality Rates



Therelationship between human resources /human resource management andmortality rates within the hospital setting (counting quality ofconcern in health care centres), is an essential theme in theorganizational sciences however, much has not been done in terms ofresearch of to examine this relationship in hospital set up.According to a research that was carried out in England involvingdifferent hospitals, 61 human resource directors filled theirquestionnaires and responded to the interviews carried out inrelation to their procedures and practices. The interviews carriedout mined for data in regard to sophistication and extensiveness ofappraisal for hospital employees the sophistication and extent ofcoaching the hospital staffs and the proportion of employees workingas teams. There was also gathering of patient’ mortality data. Theconcluded results indicated that there was strong link between thepatient’s mortality and the HR practices in general. Thesophistication and extent of assessment in the hospitals was mainlypowerfully connected, but there were acquaintances too with thecomplexity of training for employees, and also with the proportionsof employees working in teams.

KeyWords teams, appraisal, human resource management, mortalityrates, hospitals and training.

Factors that predictorganizational performance or effectiveness has been viewed as one ofthe key subjects within the ground of organizational science. Healthcare centers are concerned with making best use of effectiveness viathe implementation of suitable management practices and policies.Effectiveness in the healthcare centers can be measured wheneverdeath rates are minimized by the success of illness treatment.Therefore, this has led to examination of an extensive scope thatincludes environmental conditions, strategy, technology and structureconditions. Inside the behaviour of organizational literature, theeffects of human resource management or people management practiceshas been examined by a substantial body of research pertainingorganizational outcomes. Quality of care is the degree to whichhealth care for populations and individuals heightens the expectationof preferred health results and are reliable with currentprofessional knowledge.

Muchof the study literature probing the impacts of HRM on organizationalperformance or effectiveness has fixed on the difference between“progressive” and “traditional” HRM exercises. According todifferent observers, they suggest that HRM practices that formsynergistic, overlapping system of practices are expected to give wayemployees competent of absolute impact on organizationalpresentation. These HRM procedures affect performance by improvingstaffs skills/ knowledge and commitment by offering them with thecaution essential to capitalize on these commitments and skills. Cost minimization and control are seen as the traditional practicesof HRM that usually based on the principle of Taylorist. Theseconcepts absorb the exercise of occupations that has low levels ofskill autonomy and variety, and the reduction of expenditure oncompensation, development, training and selection. HRM practices thatare progressive, on the other hand, intend to make best use of themotivation, skill and knowledge of employees. Cases in point comprisethe use of authenticated selection measures (for instancepsychometric tests and structured interviews), performanceappraisals, comprehensive training programs, job enrichment,systematic, incentives, team working, non-monetary benefits andcontribution in decision-making. Various studies carried out haveverified that progressive HRM practices are confidently linked withorganizational profitability and productivity (Burke&amp Cooper 2008).

Other analyses related toprogressive HRM practices propose that these exercises improveorganizational profitability and productivity by improving themotivation, performance, knowledge, and skills of the employees.Without a doubt, through the research report carried out by thecorrespondence bodies, HRM practices, such as training and selection,are linked with improved job performance at the personal level ofexamination. In addition, progressive HRM practices can augmentnationality behaviour (being helpful and cooperative with colleagues,making efforts beyond the required as well as conducting goodteamwork) and that approaches closely concurrent to citizenshipperformance, for example, job satisfaction, partially arbitrate therelationship linking organizational profitability and productivityand progressive HRM.

Accordingto a study carried out in United States, it examined the relationshipbetween the mortality rates and organisation of nursing care.Hospitals that were able to retain and attract opportunities providedas well as retaining good nurses for good nursing care were broughtto comparison of 195 ‘control’ hospitals. Mortality rates,attuned for differences in forecasted transience, were 4.6% lesser inthe ‘magnet’ healthcares than the controls. The study relied onlyon the status of the magnet hospitals relatively to any more intendeddata for the purposes of explanations and categorisation for theresults were essentially highly exploratory (Bloom,Propper, Seiler, &amp Van Reenen, 2010).

Inrelation to the research undertaken, the examination studied theconnection between the results such as quality of healthcare andmanagement of staffs in acute hospitals. Instead of focusing on microaspects of staffs management or microanalysis of personal diseaseclassifications, the research took a strategic or a macro perspectiveon the connection among organizational outcomes and the peoplemanagement. The intended plan of the research was to determinewhether patient mortality information was determined by the hospitalperformance or HRM practices. The plan was to confirm the practicesthat affect the outcomes and also to know whether there is aconnection between effectiveness, quality of care and HRM practices.The HRM practices affect performance by enhancing staffs’commitment, skills and knowledge (McKee,2010).

The analysis of literature onorganizational performance and people management propose that theremain practices that are Analysis of the literature on peoplemanagement and organizational performance suggests there are keypractices that are probably associated positively with levels ofperformance teamwork, training and appraisal.

Training is aimed on whethertechnical, skill development, soft or clinical skills includinginterviewing, leadership and team working. Appraisal schemes areplanned to advance feedback processes and goal setting so that theemployees can improve, direct and correct their performance. Thepurpose of training is to equip the employees with the requiredskills to perform their jobs as well as advancing their performanceskills with time. With effective training, the healthcare centres areguaranteed that there will be reduction of patient mortality andhigher quality of patient care. The organization ought to invest moreto train their employees as well keeping them updated with theupcoming information. Through such trainings the employees becomemore informed of new techniques and information relating to theirprofession.

Thereis substantial evidence that the sophistication and extensiveness ofappraisal are concurrent to changes in personal performance. Aresearch carried out recently shows out that team working in thehealth centres is linked with lower stages of stress that thequality of working as a team processes is connected to ranking ofinnovation and effectiveness in quality of patient care in communitymental health and primary health care teams and thatmultidisciplinary in groups is strongly linked with improvement inprimary health care of patient care. Individual’s objectives androles are usually well defined for them in their work to determinetheir development needs, provision with feedback on performance andto communicate to them about their importance and value. Therefore,the employees whose roles have been clearly defined will carry outtheir roles effectively hence influencing the patient mortality(Gené-Badia,Ascaso, Escaramis-Babiano, Pujol-Ribera, &amp Sampietro-Colom,2008).

Teamworking enables shared understanding and knowledge about patientlower error rates, good decision making, needs and more helpfulpatient revival. Each anevery memberbelonging to group of practitioners will find it easier to expresstheir skills to the team members who will evaluate everyone’s ideaand viewing it in detail hence bringing forth a positive outcome.Different minds have different ideas and different knowledge as well.Therefore, team work is an essential tool that can foresee greatachievement as members will share their ideas before implementing anypractice. This reduces risks if someone is not sure about the outcomeof service being provided hence increasing high patient mortality.Therefore, whenever health centres works in teams the likelihood isthat the team members will utilize and share their tacit skills henceacting upon any information that is ambiguous found in hospital setup.

Staffinvolvement is another key element of high performance HRM system.The employer puts more effort in finding more participativetechniques to manage staff and encourage the employees to be morecommitted to the success of the organization. Staff involvement isimproved whenever employees are enabled to exert influence over theirwork and decision-making through form of decentralization. It isbelieved that employees have extensive pool of information that canhave impact on organizational structure. For instance, they are saidto be good in acting upon any information found in health care thatis ambiguous since they share skills through team working,involvement in decision making and through their trainings (Fairbank&amp Williams 2001).

Whenthe management fail to involve staff in the process ofdecision-making, this becomes a loss of potential to the employees.When the HRM involves their employees in making decision, thisreduces the risk of ‘group think’. Through involving theemployees, it heightens motivation as well as assisting inimprovement of cooperation and communication as the employees cancoordinate with one another thus saving the time of management andcontributing to organizational learning. Motivation of employeesmakes them feel that they are appreciated and their efforts arerespected. This increases their performance as they feel that theyowe the organisation. Failure to employees being appreciated, thiscauses them feel unsecure to even maximize their skills in their workplaces. The employer should as well recognize the efforts of theemployees by giving them an increment in their salaries as a resultof their improved performance that makes the organization have a goodreputation to the society as well as to individuals. These kinds ofincentives make them give their best in the work places.

Ithas been recorded that, the employees of any given health care whoreport higher levels of direct involvement usually report increasedlevels of role innovation, loyalty, cooperation and clarity withco-workers which in turn have been linked to patient quality care.Description of quality provided by American Nurses Associationdiscovered that heightened decision-making and autonomy latitude,nurse collaboration and empowerment were linked with lower mortalityrates on patients (Rafferty,Clarke, Ball, James, &amp Aiken, 2007).).

Eventually, security ofemployment positions is key component to HRM high performance systemthat is expected to certify the preservation of skills developed viaappraisal and training and to uphold effective team work as a resultnot to disrupt relationships established. Job satisfaction of theemployees is linked to the security of employment. Provision ofsecurity in employment improves the mutual commitment required toeffectively benefit from the use of delegated decision-making teams,workplace innovations, authority and information sharing. As comparedto contractual basis, employees will put more of their effortstowards provision of better health services to their patients. Staffsthat are on contract basis may not put more efforts towards thedevelopment of the organisation since their span of being in thesepositions is limited. This therefore, hinders the staff to maximisetheir skills to the health care as they have no enough time to digfrom their pool of information (West, Borrill, Dawson, Carter,Anelay, Patterson &amp Waring, 2002) Employment security with timeit builds up trust between the employers and the workers eventuallyyielding higher cooperation and stronger relationships.

It is the grouping ofcollection of high performance practices that is essential to formstrong association between patient mortality and the general scalegauge of the high performance HRM system. Such practices are expectedto be equally coherent and reinforcing an interconnected systemthereby leading to provision of high quality hence lower mortality inpatients.

In conclusion, putting intopractice a sophisticated training requires training strategy andanalysis heartening staff participation in decisions that touchestheir conditions and jobs decentralizing choice making providingjob security and cheering team working in other environment. Afterthis is done the organizational goals will be achieved in high rate,employees working in their level best as they are highly motivatedhence reducing the mortality rate of the patients and improving thequality health care for every individual who visits these health carecentres. The leadership in healthcare organizations should centre ondeveloping an internally consistent HRM system that supportscommitment and high performance amid employees. This comprises ofensuring an effective and sophisticated advance to appraisal that ispractical across to all employees. As discussed above, organizationsthat score higher on their HR system will have higher levels ofskills and knowledge either through performance management oremphasis on training are clear about their goals and roles in theirorganizations that is as result of team working and appraisal boththe employees and the management are willing to utilize and sharetheir implicit knowledge as an outcome of higher levels ofinvolvement and decentralization of decision making are sanctionedto bring in their higher quality information, tacit knowledge andhigher skills so as to solve complex hospital problems as employeeinvolvement in decision making enables them to influence theirworking conditions and job are in a position to act upon theambiguous information usually found in health care set up throughteam work, shared learning, decision making involvement and traininglastly, less possibility to leave, leading to a retention of bothsocial capital and human capital. These behaviours have thepossibility to influence the quality of patient care hence patientmortality.


Bloom,N., Propper, C., Seiler, S., &amp Van Reenen, J. (2010).&nbspTheimpact of competition on management quality: evidence from publichospitals&nbsp(No.w16032). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Burke,R. J., &amp Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2008).&nbspBuildingmore effective organizations: HR management and performance inpractice.Cambridge University Press.

Fairbank,J. F., &amp Williams, S. D. (2001). Motivating Creativity andEnhancing Innovation through Employee Suggestion SystemTechnology.&nbspCreativityand Innovation Management,&nbsp10(2),68-74.

Gené-Badia,J., Ascaso, C., Escaramis-Babiano, G., Pujol-Ribera, E., &ampSampietro-Colom, L. (2008). Population and primary health-care teamcharacteristics explain the quality of the service.&nbspHealthPolicy,&nbsp86(2-3),335-344.

McKee,L. (2010).&nbspUnderstandingthe dynamics of organisational culture change: creating safe placesfor patients and staff&nbsp(Doctoraldissertation, University of Aberdeen).

Rafferty,A. M., Clarke, S, Ball, J., James, P, &amp Aiken, L. H. (2007).Outcomes of variation in hospital nurse staffing in Englishhospitals: Cross-sectional analysis of survey data and dischargerecords.InternationalJournal of Nursing Studies,&nbsp44(2),175-182.

West,M.A., Borrill C., Dawson, J., Carter, M., Anelay, S., Patterson, M.,Waring, J. (2002). The link between the management of employees andpatient mortality in acute hospitals. TheInternational Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 8,1299-1310.