e-learningsite.com

free essays
Free essays

Mending Wall by Robert Frost Analysis

MendingWall by Robert Frost Analysis

Mendingwall by Robert Frost presents emancipating imagination in a playfulphase, in guidance of a man who has the whole world under hiscontrol. In this man serenity, he is riding his reality`s void ofbeing shocked by the realities into a traumatic response. Mendingwall is North Boston structure and suggests in its sound contrast thedark tones in significant poems.The poem in literal form says that a stone separates the property ofthe speaker from the neighbours. In every year, the wall issubsequently damaged by hunters and harsh weather conditions (Frostand Louis 2).During the spring, two neighbours walk towards the wall and makerepairs. In the same regard, the speaker sees no sound reason keepingthe wall by repairing since there are no cows, fruits or anythingthat is contained. The theme is that you will not know a personunless you put down the wall. The article aims to present an analysisof the mending the wall by Robert Frost.

Thespeaker can be said to be philosophical, unconvinced, and amiable.The philosophical aspect is presented in the use of diction andfigurative language such as when the speaker says that &quotspringsin mischief&quot (line 28). The speaker also presents hisamicability when he converse in a friendly tone with his neighbourabout the importance of that wall. Lastly, the tone of the speaker isyearn full and thus inquires for change and an end to the wall.The two men mend the wall out of just a mere habit of mending thewall, yet the very nature conspire against them and makes their workSisyphean. Sisyphus is Greek mythology set into condemnation pushinga boulder up the hill only the boulder roll down again. The men thenpush the boulder up again (Frost and Louis 2).

Anauditory observation is that the poem is dramatic and harmoniousquality which is created through the aspect of euphony. In addition,harsh and cold sounding quality is produced through a sequence ofrepetition of boulders and stones. In the same vein, there is acacophonous auditory aspect which is produced by the improper grammarseen in the line saying that “something there is that does not lovea wall.&quot Thus, the aspect grabs the attention of the reader.

Thestructure of this poem is that the blank verse with no stanza andrhymes, breaks, or rhyming patterns. The intentions of the writer inthis form are that it carries the conversational and natural qualityof the poem. The poem physical appearance and structure on the paperresembles a solid stone wall that provides because no breaks. Theother literary device that is evident in the poem is figurativelanguage and metaphor whose presence is throughout the poem from thebeginning to the end. The literary device functions to present theambiguity and give inspiration to all kinds of in textinterpretations. In a similar respect, it displays humor that isdiscernible when the speaker tells his friend that the apple treeswill at no time get across and eat the pines under his pines (lines25-26) (Frost et al 5).

Anotherpoetic device that is evident in the poem is the use of visualimagery. It produces a vital effect by giving the speaker inelaborating the details of wall mending. This can be discerned in thesecond and third line &quotthe frozen ground-swell spills the upperboulders in the sun&quot (lines 2-3). Diction is also another devicethat is used in the poem. For example, there are at least ten linesthat portray the intention of the speaker in the word choice. Dictionis works to improve the ambiguity especially in line one. In the samerespect, it gives emphasis in order to focus and draw the attentionof the readers on particular idea or concept. It can, therefore, bedistinguished when the speaker says, &quotthere where it is we donot need the wall,&quot since it the basic idea that is set underdiscussion (line 23) (Frost et al 8).

Furthermore,the use of symbolism is another literary device in the heart of thepoem. The stone wall is a symbol of a divide existing between theproperties putting up the boundaries and the confinements. The symboldevelops the neighbor’s character having an old fashioned andancient way of thinking that is noticeable through choice of wordssuch as elves, spells, and an old savage (Frostet al 10).

Finally,the poem presents the use of irony that is evident throughout thepoem. It is made in several remarks that present humor by the speakerthroughout the poem. The irony defining the wall is that a friend andthe speaker rebuild the wall during every season of spring only thesubsequent year to be destroyed. Mending the wall is pointless sinceit will be damaged once again and the process continues every year(Morris 12).

Conclusion

Thepresence o&shyf the wall ensures the quality relationship inherentin the neighbors. Maintaining the division between the properties,the friend and the narrators are consistent with their personalidentity and individuality as farmers one of pine tree and one ofapple trees. Furthermore, the consistent action of wall mendingpresents an opportunity the two neighbors to communicate and interactwith one another, an aspect that might not occur in rural, remoteenvironment. The act of meeting together and repairing the wall givesthe two men a capacity to improve their relationship and thecommunity at large more than if each person would live in an isolatedneighborhood and separate properties.

WorksCited

Frost,Robert, and Louis Untermeyer. RobertFrost`s Poems.New York, NY: St. Martin Paperbacks, 2002. Print.

Frost,Robert, Margery S. Hellmann, and Margery S. Hellmann. MendingWall.Seattle, WA: Holburne, 2000. Print.

Morris,Daniel. LyricEncounters: Essays on American Poetry from Lazarus and Frost to OrtizCofer and Alexei.New York: Wiley. Print.