READING RESPONSE 5
Oneof the reasons that have made Mumford anti-automobile is the factthat increased available of cars has shrunken the value car ownersheld in the past. He asserts sometimes back, when cars were few,people strived to purchase cars because they helped to increase theirpersonal ego that had been suppressed by the overwhelming humaninnovation. Second, he claims that cars consume a large amount ofincome for many people. The author asserts that the cost of providingdrivers with safe roads leaves the government, the economy, andAmericans in general in financial strains. Despite the fact that theresources are limited, Americans purchase costly cars then struggleto access quality health care, pay school fees, access to librariesand capacity to finance security personnel.
Isupport Mumford’s argument of anti-automobile since many cars aresacrificing basic essential needs in order to purchase cars. Inaddition, Americans are fond of adopting culture, so they strive topurchase the latest cars. Although a trendy culture is beneficial forbusiness, it has proven backwards for individuals because they spendmoney they could have used to develop their lifestyle in financingcars. Moreover, they cannot afford quality education and health careservices among other basic social services because cars often takelarge sums of their incomes.
Oneof the efficient urban mass transportation the author suggests isconstructions of roads similar to the “German autobahns.” Thisaccess to autobahns is restricted, but they offer enhancedtransportation system. Such roads would reject some cars from usingit, but it will provide high quality transportation services foreveryone.
Autobahnswould be hard to execute in the United States since the country haswell developed infrastructure. This means that even drivers areprevented from accessing the superhighways they will havealternative routes they can use to get to their respectivedestination.
Mumford,L., & Blake, C. N. (2000). Artand technics.New York, NY [u.a.: Columbia Univ. Press.