e-learningsite.com

free essays
Free essays

Yes, Recovery Is Possible (Rebecca A. Clay)

Yes,Recovery Is Possible (Rebecca A. Clay)

InstitutionName

Yes,Recovery Is Possible (Rebecca A. Clay)

Accordingto Rebecca A. Clay, it is possible for the mentally challenged torecover fully. The author quotes APA’s Serious Mental Illness andSevere Emotional Disturbance task force chair, Mary A. Jansen thatmental illness is just like any other chronic illness, 0onlyn that itis stigmatized. It is possible to recover fully if one has a team ofhealth professionals at their disposal to oversee the acute stagerecovery. Once the acute stage recovery is achieved, it marks thegeneral onset of the recovery stage. If there were a push the same asthat for rehabilitation in the mental healthcare sector, the processwould be easy. Therefore, there is a push to establish such aninitiative. This is why APA, in conjunction with other organizationsaimed at improving mental treatment , such as, SAMHSA, AmericanPsychiatric Nurses Association, Council on Social Work Education andNational Association of Peers Specialists is determined to improvethe take on mental illness treatment by setting up the right measuresand encouraging physicians to follow them.

Theauthor poses strong point in her arguments in that she argues that ifthe right form of support is given to the mentally ill, there will beadequate recovery. The author points out the efforts of the former USpresident Bush in accelerating metal recovery by establishing the NewFreedom Commission on Mental Health. This commission identified flawsin the national system that dealt with mental healthcare. In thereport, amendment of the system would mean a great improvement of themental healthcare system, hence increasing recovery of the patients.Currently, the Recovery to Practice is working to make the vision ofthe commission a reality. This includes envisioning a future wherewith mental illness would recover fully through effective treatmentand support. However, there are some weaknesses in the author’sargument in that it is clear that the recovery process is not wellintegrated into psychology. Multiple economic, political, social andtechnological barriers still put this mission as a dream yet to bediscovered. Some psychologists are adamant to change, therefore,being unwilling to change their practice orientation. Others feardealing with people with serious mental illness due to the stigmathat is associated with such extents of mental disturbance. There isa shortage of housing options. Additionally, the author points outshortage of support staff services that can facilitate the process ofrecovery, which makes the work of psychologists extra hard.

Inmy course of learning, it is true that there is a lot of stigmaassociated with mental illness and therefore, less healthcarepractitioners are willing to associate closely to these conditions.The support staffing for mental cases is low since most people viewmental patients as difficult to deal with. Indeed, they can become ahandful, but that does not necessarily mean they should be neglected. However, it is also true that mental illness is just like any otherchronic illness and therefore, it is possible to treat it if theright measures are observed. Just as cardiologists would pay closeattention to a patient with cardiac disease and monitor theirprogress, mentally ill patients also need that close attention fromthe [psychologists, with the progress report assessed regularly. Itis neglecting the role that makes it difficult to achieve the desiredresults. On the other hand, I beg to differ with the author on theargument that psychologists find it challenging to deal with mentalillness since some of them are unwilling to change their practiceorientation. It is possible to achieve the desired results even withthe old fashion way of treatment. The most important thing is thatthe progress should be monitored closely and the necessary support isavailable.

Thereshould be a change in the way people view mental patients. Thisincludes a change in the stigmatized perception. This is what poseschallenge to the necessary healthcare support services needed, sincemost people do not want to associate with mental illness.Psychiatrists should also accept a change in the practiceorientation. This includes a change in their perception of therecovery process. It also includes how it affects their work. Theright training and education system in the study of psychiatry wouldenable this. There is need for an incorporation of the vision of theNew Freedom Commission on Mental Health in the curriculum.

Personally,as I conclude, I think the general recommendations and suggestions ofthe article should be put to practice throughout the world. If therewere no stigma and negative perception of the recovery process of thementally ill, the recovery process would be a bit easier and faster.Thinking of mental illness and disturbance as a normal chronicillness is important since it will make people deal with it with asober mind. The challenges mentioned in the article in facilitatingrecovery of these patients are solvable. In cases of inadequatesupport services, the right education and training will be a way ofsolving it. Retraining of the older psychiatrists also facilitates achange in their perception of recovery of the mentally ill, and theimpact of the recovery on their work (Davidson et al, 2005).

Reference

Clay,R. A. (2012). Yes, Recovery is Possible.American Psychological Association Journal, 43(1),52.

Davidson,L., O’Connell, M. J., Tondora, J. Lawless, M., &amp Evans, A. C.(2005). Recoveri in Serious Mental Illness: A New Wine or Just a NewBottle? ProfessionalPsychology: Research and Practice,36(5), 480.